Innovation Economics · Institutional overlap

The Triple Helix.

Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff: innovation emerges from the interaction of three institutional spheres — universities, industry, and government — each taking on roles traditionally held by the others. Universities commercialise. Firms do basic research. Governments take equity stakes. The model describes Silicon Valley, Cambridge UK, and Israel's tech ecosystem better than older linear models did. The interesting work happens in the overlaps; the centre is the rarest and most productive intersection.

University Industry Government Public research Doctoral training CSIR · HSRC Corporate R&D JSE-listed labs MEA bank AI teams DSI · DTIC National AI policy Public procurement Uni × Industry Spinouts · tech-transfer Industry-funded chairs Uni × Gov NRF grants SARChI chairs Industry × Gov SEZs · tax credits Sovereign equity Triple Helix Mission-led AI funds Sovereign innovation co-investment
SA / MEA-anchored examples. The richer the overlap, the more permeable the boundaries between the three spheres.

The thesis

Triple Helix is operationally useful because it points to specific intervention levers: technology-transfer offices, sovereign innovation funds, university-affiliated incubators, mission-oriented public procurement. It can also produce concentrated outcomes if the helix is geographically narrow — one university region, one industry cluster, one tier of government. Broadening it across provinces, across historically disadvantaged universities, across both formal and informal sectors is itself a distributional choice. The question for any board engaging with university partnerships is which institutions and which geographies are inside the helix — and which are outside.

← All models